Re:Symantec CEO says source code reviews by foreign states p...
by codedokode on Wednesday October 11, 2017 @04:45PM
(#15453309)
It would make more sence to make the code open source but not free - anyone can see but nobody can use the code.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Symantec CEO says source code reviews by foreign states p...
by dec0dedab0de on Wednesday October 11, 2017 @07:26PM
(#15454441)
The term open source implies the code is free. Simply having the source available does not make it open source.
Re:Symantec CEO says source code reviews by foreign states p...
by arkona on Wednesday October 11, 2017 @06:33PM
(#15454127)
And how would you enforce that? What would prevent anyone with access to the code from building it and using it? I don't see any way except maybe stripping the code of significant parts
Re:Symantec CEO says source code reviews by foreign states p...
by jononor on Wednesday October 11, 2017 @07:35PM
(#15454500)
You could keep the virus fingerprint database outside the codebase. Customers would then pay for access (and updates) to the fingerprints.
The fingerprints have to be some sorts of data, like regular expressions or other limited instruction set which can only parse the incoming file and not communicate with outside world.
The company could automatically release fingerprints into the open after a time, say 6 months.
Re:Symantec CEO says source code reviews by foreign states p...
by arkona on Thursday October 12, 2017 @08:37PM
(#15462524)
So... stripping the code of significant parts
This seems like a pretty good business model idea though!
Re:Symantec CEO says source code reviews by foreign states p...
by codedokode on Wednesday October 11, 2017 @09:43PM
(#15455065)
Copyright laws?