News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Corrosion of High School Debate by mikestew on Tuesday October 10, 2017 @02:17PM (#15444048)
In the U. S., it is common to count off one second of time with "one million one" (usually in sequence: "1 MM 1, 1 MM 2,..."). And if one desires to be accurate in the counting of time, one will say that at about a conversational pace. IOW, a commonly used method of estimating time says that conversational pace is closer to 180 wpm. Even considering the two monosyllabic words in this example, it sure as hell ain't 60 wpm.

EDIT: a quick DDG search on "conversational english words per minute" indicates an almost universal agreement of somewhere in the range of 140-180 wpm, as with parent's Google search.

Re:The Corrosion of High School Debate by erik_seaberg on Tuesday October 10, 2017 @02:51PM (#15444330)
That's 240 syllables per minute. Is speaking really so skew towards short words?
Re:The Corrosion of High School Debate by int_19h on Tuesday October 10, 2017 @03:40PM (#15444749)
The average number of syllables per English word is ~1.4. For an alternative perspective, 71.5% of all English words are monosyllabic, and 19.4% are bisyllabic.
Re:The Corrosion of High School Debate by ezrast on Tuesday October 10, 2017 @03:34PM (#15444699)
Your post averages 1.69 syllables per word; this one is 1.86. There's no way the conversational average is higher than two.