News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Science Makes “Rick and Morty” Great by rockostrich on Monday October 09, 2017 @11:37AM (#15434739)
I think they mean the show and not the characters. Even in that case, the show really isn't about nothing anymore than other sitcoms like Friends and Cheers are about nothing. The show still has plot lines. My love of Seinfeld is mostly how well the plot lines within each episode are weaved together and how the show invented so many phrases that we now use (or at least I use and most people understand).

The show is so quotable and relatable even almost 20 years later. Friends also does a pretty good job of this, but my problem with Friends is that you're supposed to like the characters (except Ross maybe) and they're all pretty terrible people. Seinfeld doesn't try and hide how terrible its characters are.

Re:How Science Makes “Rick and Morty” Great by tptacek on Monday October 09, 2017 @12:17PM (#15435133)
The characters in both Friends and Cheers cared about other characters. Neither had the "no hugging, no learning" rule. The Friends characters were self-absorbed, but they weren't nihilists.
Re:How Science Makes “Rick and Morty” Great by humanrebar on Monday October 09, 2017 @12:21PM (#15435181)
Also the Seinfeld characters are funny people. They say funny things. The Friends characters are mostly put into funny situations (though Phoebe has a good line from time to time).