Re:The Rise of the Rich Renter
by efficax on Saturday October 07, 2017 @05:05PM
(#15425702)
I make a decent living, way above median household income, but my wife and I rent in a dense urban center for the simple reason that even with our income we couldn't afford to own in this area. Even if we weren't paying student loans it would take several years to build up a down payment that would result in cheaper mortgage payments than our rent burden, which would be crucial since homeownership adds property taxes and significant upkeep costs above the mortgage payment. Sure, we could afford a house in the 'burbs, but we don't want to live in the 'burbs. The rent is too damn high, but so are the housing prices.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Likewise for me. I chose to live in an apartment in the city center / startup hub (and walk to work) vs buy a house in the suburbs with a half hour commute every day. There are condos here but the market is much higher.
Re:The Rise of the Rich Renter
by matt_wulfeck on Saturday October 07, 2017 @05:20PM
(#15425768)
7 years of saving I believe is the average for a down payment. It doesn’t sound like your story is too outside the range of normal.
Seems to make sense, buy a house 3x your annual income, with 20% down you could get that in 7 years if you save away 8.5% per year. And you have a house at 29
Re:The Rise of the Rich Renter
by davidjnelson on Sunday October 08, 2017 @11:48PM
(#15431458)
Lol, houses for 3x your income? I take it you don't live in the Bay Area ;-)
That's a general rule of thumb for safe mortgages...which is why so many rent in bay area
Re:The Rise of the Rich Renter
by techisamix on Saturday October 07, 2017 @05:24PM
(#15425785)
I haven't heard that before, link?
Re:The Rise of the Rich Renter
by rentcontrol on Saturday October 07, 2017 @05:22PM
(#15425776)
Is it actually too high? It sounds like it's just right to me. Clearly you're paying the premium to live close.