Re:The Supreme Court discussed my research on gerrymandering...
by tormeh on Friday October 06, 2017 @02:33PM
(#15419172)
Most states already are irrelevant. Your vote in US elections don't count unless you live in Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, or Wisconsin.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Supreme Court discussed my research on gerrymandering...
by dragonwriter on Friday October 06, 2017 @04:05PM
(#15419958)
No, it counts, it's just those states have recently been competitive. But being competitive or not is just the aggregate effect of individual votes; and which states are competitive or dominated by one party or the other changes over time, sometimes quite rapidly. (Some of us can remember when, in Presidential elections, California was viewed as a Republican presidential lock.)
Re:The Supreme Court discussed my research on gerrymandering...
by InitialLastName on Friday October 06, 2017 @03:29PM
(#15419688)
That's only true of the presidential election. Senators in states other than those can often go either way, and in the House it's pretty much district-by-district whether your vote matters.
Re:The Supreme Court discussed my research on gerrymandering...
by mobilefriendly on Friday October 06, 2017 @03:54PM
(#15419871)
Maine and Nebraska use a proportional vote so it matters there in some districts. Also Arizona, New Mexico, Missouri, and Georgia are usually battleground states.
Re:The Supreme Court discussed my research on gerrymandering...
by dragonwriter on Friday October 06, 2017 @03:56PM
(#15419896)
Maine and Nebraska assign the votes corresponding to House seats to winners in each Congressional District, they do not use a proportional system.