News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Distributed Ledger without the Blockchain by geekpowa on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @05:48PM (#15405013)
A few different sources compute similar results.

All of them acknowledge difficulty in computation. It's like trying to solve the drake equation. Unless you know all the terms in the equation accurately the number at the end isn't terribly useful.

Many different computations seem to be in same order of magnitude.

The result of high energy consumption is unsurprising and intuitive, given the design principal of PoW. It's all about who is prepared to do the most work, up until economic limits set by current BTC rate.

Re:Distributed Ledger without the Blockchain by firethief on Thursday October 05, 2017 @03:17PM (#15411833)
Let's do an upper bound, assuming miners are making enough to pay for their electricity (at an extremely low price), but not to pay any of their other costs (cooling, hardware, server operation, profit, etc):

(12.5 * 6) BTC/h * 2000 USD/BTC * (1/0.02) kWh/USD = 7.5 GW

Ok, that is a lot. Energy usage is on the order of a few million Americans. Sorry, I based my first reply on a debunk that doesn't sound accurate!