News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What a debate about p-values shows about science by nonbel on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @10:40AM (#15392706)
>"vaguely P(observations|pure noise generator) ~ P(pure noise generator | observations)"

For this to be true, P(observations) ~ P(pure noise generator) as you said earlier. Anyway, you can look at it from either perspective, doesn't really matter.

On what basis do you claim this is reasonable to expect? I suspect you have none whatsoever... in fact simple thought experiments will lead us to the opposite conclusion, and there is plenty of data telling us the same.

There are no comments on this comment yet.