News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What a debate about p-values shows about science by nonbel on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @01:08AM (#15390321)
No, the other poster is referring to Bayes' rule P(A|B) = P(A)*P(B|A)/P(B).

The claim is that it is reasonable to assume P(A) ~ P(B), so that P(A|B) ~ P(B|A). I am referring to P(A) and P(B) in the equation.

Re:What a debate about p-values shows about science by Bromskloss on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @08:08AM (#15391814)
Ah, OK, got it.
Re:What a debate about p-values shows about science by nonbel on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @01:16AM (#15398407)
Its hard to tell over the internet, but if you are being sarcastic please let me know. I have no problem with clarifying further.
Re:What a debate about p-values shows about science by Bromskloss on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @11:37AM (#15401229)
No sarcasm! I believe I understand what you were saying now.