Re:What a debate about p-values shows about science
by throwaway2048 on Monday October 02, 2017 @07:35PM
(#15388860)
The problem is the incentives don't change with a system like that, all that will happen is you have people rigging the pre-registers after they have already completed the study then sitting on results until the correct amount of time has passed.
The idea is probably only applicable to a small subset of scientific work (not good for exploratory and very novel stuff, for instance), but in certain specific areas it might make publication of negative results a more viable path for scientists because they don't have to fear that their idea was bad or they seem incompetent because of a negative result. (Since their design was accepted, at least some other people thought it was a good idea too.)