News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why kernel development still uses email (2016) by abiox on Saturday September 30, 2017 @02:56PM (#15374440)
btw "echo chamber" is generally perceived as disparaging, so it's not weird people wouldn't be impressed by that. and feigning victimhood after antagonizing people is pretty gauche.
Re:Why kernel development still uses email (2016) by na85 on Saturday September 30, 2017 @04:48PM (#15374907)
It was intended to be disparaging: one of my major beefs with this community is the massive culture of groupthink and aggressive self reinforcement/adulation.
Re:Why kernel development still uses email (2016) by abiox on Saturday September 30, 2017 @05:57PM (#15375191)
> It was intended to be disparaging

and thus your thesis of 'HN doesn't like to be reminded' falls to the simpler explanation of 'trashtalk usually gets downvoted'.

Re:Why kernel development still uses email (2016) by na85 on Saturday September 30, 2017 @08:20PM (#15375723)
Perhaps.

I prefer to see it as the down votes reaffirming that I am correct.

Re:Why kernel development still uses email (2016) by gsich on Saturday September 30, 2017 @08:53PM (#15375826)
you are correct. if people get triggered by someone using the word "echo chamber" they are probably in one. It's hard to admit, I know.
Re:Why kernel development still uses email (2016) by abiox on Sunday October 01, 2017 @11:27AM (#15378269)
what do you mean by "get triggered"? if someone downvotes trashtalk, does it necessarily mean they "got triggered"? are there other explanations?
Re:Why kernel development still uses email (2016) by gsich on Sunday October 01, 2017 @01:42PM (#15378888)
Yes. Because it wasn't trashtalk. HN in generel seems (from what I observe) like a place that uses fancy apps for communication instead of emails. So if someone claims that HN doesn't like emails and get downvoted for that, they got triggered.