Re:Why Does Sweden Have So Many Startups?
by macNchz on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:23AM
(#15371227)
These Cato ‘welfare package’ papers have been circulating for a long time and are misleading. Their calculations wind up being for a maximum amount of benefits someone could receive if their life circumstances happened to fit a multitude of criteria. In reality someone falling on hard times would only qualify for a small fraction of those amounts.
Here are two articles that dig into how the Cato numbers are technically possible but not useful for having a real dialogue about the benefits people wind up receiving in real life:
http://www.politifact.com/rhode-island/statements/2015/feb/0...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/12/...
CATO's numbers also match the Post's. They did a 2013 follow-up study to a prior 1995 study they did of work vs welfare trade-offs on a state by state basis. There is probably no more comprehensive source than their study, that I'm aware of.
"this study seeks to determine the approximate level of benefits that a typical welfare family, consisting of a single mother with two children, might receive"
[34 states come in above $25,000]
https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/the_wo...