Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by biohax2015 on Thursday September 28, 2017 @04:55PM
(#15360638)
Sales is more difficult than engineering. There, I said it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by SturgeonsLaw on Thursday September 28, 2017 @07:57PM
(#15361757)
For a certain type of person, sales is much easier - if not completely natural. For others, the same could be said about technical pursuits.
I don't think it's possible to make general statements that one is harder than the other, because it depends very heavily on the person involved.
Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by sidlls on Thursday September 28, 2017 @05:38PM
(#15360955)
I disagree. Sales is fuzzier than engineering and requires a different set of skills and methods to resolve problems.
Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by abraae on Thursday September 28, 2017 @05:49PM
(#15361040)
They're both hard.
Rockstar salespeople are just as impressive in action as rockstar developers.
Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by pcsanwald on Thursday September 28, 2017 @07:16PM
(#15361568)
The skillset is fuzzier, but the results are not fuzzier, as reflected by common practices of sales compensation across the industry.
Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by richardjennings on Friday September 29, 2017 @06:39PM
(#15369871)
I'm sure selling mediocre, repackaged, off the shelf tech is harder than engineering it. Standing on the shoulders of giants gets us a long way quickly (and easily). IMHO engineering is more valuable; I define value as the expansion of possibilities & opportunities (to sell).