Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by biohax2015 on Thursday September 28, 2017 @04:55PM
(#15360638)
Sales is more difficult than engineering. There, I said it.
Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by SturgeonsLaw on Thursday September 28, 2017 @07:57PM
(#15361757)
For a certain type of person, sales is much easier - if not completely natural. For others, the same could be said about technical pursuits.
I don't think it's possible to make general statements that one is harder than the other, because it depends very heavily on the person involved.
Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by sidlls on Thursday September 28, 2017 @05:38PM
(#15360955)
I disagree. Sales is fuzzier than engineering and requires a different set of skills and methods to resolve problems.
Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by abraae on Thursday September 28, 2017 @05:49PM
(#15361040)
They're both hard.
Rockstar salespeople are just as impressive in action as rockstar developers.
Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by pcsanwald on Thursday September 28, 2017 @07:16PM
(#15361568)
The skillset is fuzzier, but the results are not fuzzier, as reflected by common practices of sales compensation across the industry.
Re:Three Paths in the Tech Industry: Founder, Executive, or ...
by richardjennings on Friday September 29, 2017 @06:39PM
(#15369871)
I'm sure selling mediocre, repackaged, off the shelf tech is harder than engineering it. Standing on the shoulders of giants gets us a long way quickly (and easily). IMHO engineering is more valuable; I define value as the expansion of possibilities & opportunities (to sell).
Okay, slash your engineering staff and double the sales people and lets see how you do.
How is any of that not done by thousands of other people as well? Especially sales.