Re:UK metal detector enthusiast finds ancient Roman bronze a...
by empath75 on Thursday September 28, 2017 @10:38AM
(#15357395)
I don’t really understand why archeologists always assume every single statue from the ancient world is religious in nature. Why can’t people just buy a cute dog Knick-nack for their kitchen shelf?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:UK metal detector enthusiast finds ancient Roman bronze a...
by Isamu on Thursday September 28, 2017 @11:16AM
(#15357670)
I don't disagree with you, but in this case they are identifying the type of statue:
> The licking dog is an example of a healing statue, and may be linked to a Roman healing temple at Lydney.
I have not heard of a "healing statue", so a bit of searching found this in Wikipedia:
> Some healing temples also used sacred dogs to lick the wounds of sick petitioners.
So it is an interpretation of the statue - not a bad interpretation, but some explanation would be nice.
Re:UK metal detector enthusiast finds ancient Roman bronze a...
by tpeo on Thursday September 28, 2017 @01:47PM
(#15359258)
Not all artifacts are religious in nature, neither are they always assumed to be such. I think no one would assume a bust of Cicero or some random mosaic is a religious artifact.
But I sort of agree with the feeling, because it seems like it is that explanation which people fall back to in the absence of any other clue.