News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why did we choose Rust to develop TiKV?. Parent comment

Re:Why did we choose Rust to develop TiKV? by pjmlp on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @10:46AM (#15348278)
> Finally, they are not standardised in any way. MS tried something with 2.0 and then gave up.

They are standardized, you just need to look at the right place.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-refe...

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/visual-basic/referen...

http://fsharp.org/specs/language-spec/

https://swift.org/documentation/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why did we choose Rust to develop TiKV? by blub on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @02:12PM (#15350609)
Documentation & specs is not standardisation, not in the C or C++ sense. But you already know that, so why are we having this conversation?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why did we choose Rust to develop TiKV? by pjmlp on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @02:19PM (#15350684)
I assume you know what a de facto standard is all about.
[ Parent | on HN ]