Re:Coding in the open: how to do it securely
by Quarrelsome on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @09:41AM
(#15347678)
not really contributing to the discussion mate.
Its analytics, its a good product, people use it because its convenient.
What bearing does it have on the words in the article?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Coding in the open: how to do it securely
by Ensorceled on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @09:55AM
(#15347799)
They are implying that it's a massive security and privacy hole and they think taking security advice from somebody "who has a key under the doormat" is problematic.
Not that I necessarily agree with the original comment but that's the reasoning.
Re:Coding in the open: how to do it securely
by Quarrelsome on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @10:33AM
(#15348135)
could I not make the same argument that using English is just making the NSA's job easier? I mean, they do tap the wires don't they making much of this moot.
Re:Coding in the open: how to do it securely
by ChristianBundy on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @10:51AM
(#15348338)
You could make that argument, but I don't think it's either cohesive or convincing.