News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China Blocks WhatsApp by chaostheory on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @02:00AM (#15336525)
ok, I understand that this is an emotional subject (I can relate), so please re-read the comment that you're responding to.

1. It didn't say China lacks innovation.

2. It is not critical of China as a whole. It is critical of the ones making stupid, selfish laws in China out of fear, which imo will hurt growing innovation in China.

3. If there's no shortage of Chinese innovation, why is there so much fear of 'inferior' outside competition?

Re:China Blocks WhatsApp by IncRnd on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @08:47AM (#15338127)
Yet, the comment does say China lacks innovation.

> The end result is that China's fate as being relegated to being the world's giant copy machine is sealed unless things revert

Why do you think that China has "fear of 'inferior' outside competition"?

Re:China Blocks WhatsApp by chaostheory on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @10:53AM (#15339177)
No the comment says China WILL lose its current momentum for innovation. It’s a prediction of the future

It’s pretty evident China fears outside competition when they block competitors from entering their market. They have no confidence in their home grown companies surviving contrary to hard evidence

Re:China Blocks WhatsApp by IncRnd on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @11:55AM (#15339766)
You assume facts not in evidence and write as if your biases are evident as the truth.

China has a history of blocking outside influence in order to control the populace, so fear of competition with apps may not be the motivation.

Re:China Blocks WhatsApp by chaostheory on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @07:31PM (#15343576)
Chinese protectionism isn't new and it isn't limited to apps. There's been more than enough written on the subject.
Re:China Blocks WhatsApp by IncRnd on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @07:59PM (#15343724)
This article is about an app being blocked in China through protectionism.
Re:China Blocks WhatsApp by chaostheory on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @08:43PM (#15343958)
Is there any reason why my arguments should be limited to 1 article even though it's still on the same subject?