... What?
> female sterilizations aren't banned anywhere in the US either.
They are as a matter of practice unobtainable in many states that have tried to engage in moral panic over abortion, since many of the same clinics that provide such services are viewed as abortion providers.
> About sexual assault cases and lack of rights pertaining to due process, I would suggest that the evidence points to the opposite:
Thanks for providing a link to a broad survey of data and not a cherry picked article.
They don't have the option of birth control, what's confusing about that?
> They are as a matter of practice unobtainable in many states that have tried to engage in moral panic over abortion, since many of the same clinics that provide such services are viewed as abortion providers.
As far as I understand such clinics are cut off from federal/state funding, in line with the Hyde amendment, and in only three states, right? I'm not sure how this qualifies as systematic oppression of women.
Okay.
But also vasectomies are an unremarkable part of what many government subsidized clinics.
Again, tubal ligation isn't really frowned upon and it is also subsidized. And the ACA requires health insurance...
No one does. Overall in the US, greater amounts are spent on/by women (https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Sta...).
Men don't even have birth control, although that is generally no fault of anyone (although searching up "feminist opposition to male birth control" brings up some interesting hits: https://www.google.com/search?q=feminist+opposition+to+male+...)
I'm pretty sure female sterilizations aren't banned anywhere in the US either.
About sexual assault cases and lack of rights pertaining to due process, I would suggest that the evidence points to the opposite: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/laura-kipniss-endle...
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/09/the-ba...