News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New antibody attacks 99% of HIV strains by hashmal on Friday September 22, 2017 @02:40PM (#15314634)
"sexual responsibility" is quite an odd concept, it should be defined more precisely.
Re:New antibody attacks 99% of HIV strains by otakucode on Friday September 22, 2017 @03:16PM (#15314939)
Children are the property of their fathers. Preserving the value of that property through preserving the virginal status of females is the responsibility of both sons and daughters. For a son to have sex with the daughter of another man, both the daughter and that boy have committed a property crime against the girls father. If she gets pregnant, he will never be able to get as big of a dowry when he sells her into marriage.

At least, that's where the idea of tying sexuality to economic considerations like 'responsibility' and phrases like 'saving yourself' come from.

Re:New antibody attacks 99% of HIV strains by Dylan16807 on Friday September 22, 2017 @10:33PM (#15317715)
Totally impossible for a term like "responsible" to have multiple meanings.

Obviously people mean the economic term. Couldn't possibly be the everyday meaning.

Re:New antibody attacks 99% of HIV strains by selimthegrim on Saturday September 23, 2017 @09:20AM (#15319600)
You mean bride price, dowry is what the bride's family gives