News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China Bans Bitcoin Executives from Leaving Country, Miner... by jondubois on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @02:27AM (#15291266)
>> Pilfering from the masses.

Whenever big corporations drain resources from the masses and keeps them enslaved by essentially brainwashing them; somehow that's OK. But when something comes along which offers the masses a chance for a quick (obviously high-risk) escape from slavery, that's a scam?

I don't agree with how bureaucrats spin this; as though people need to be protected from themselves. Maybe the government should ban entrepreneurship too - that's very high risk and very random/unpredictable too.

Re:China Bans Bitcoin Executives from Leaving Country, Miner... by teknologist on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @06:18AM (#15292169)
The corporate brainwashing angle seems a bit far-fetched. I'd rather compare it with the endorsement of savings accounts with a 1% rate of interest and useless things like that.
Re:China Bans Bitcoin Executives from Leaving Country, Miner... by westmeal on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @08:52AM (#15293150)
Why does corporate brainwashing seem far-fetched to you? It happens all the time. Advertisements are all about brainwashing common people to buy things they don't really need.
Re:China Bans Bitcoin Executives from Leaving Country, Miner... by teknologist on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @09:46AM (#15293634)
How does advertising keep you "enslaved" exactly? I assume we're talking about the normal TV and internet ads kind
Re:China Bans Bitcoin Executives from Leaving Country, Miner... by hellbanner on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @10:09AM (#15293854)
I think what your GP is arguing is that corporate advertisements are symptoms of a diseased economy, where much of critical infrastructure, luxury & healthcare is controlled by the few.
Re:China Bans Bitcoin Executives from Leaving Country, Miner... by pc86 on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @10:13AM (#15293905)
When you use words like "enslaved" and "brainwashing" incorrectly (and extremely hyperbolically) like this, it dilutes what might otherwise be a relevant point.