Re:iOS 11 reviewed
by PopsiclePete on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @10:56AM
(#15285184)
The bane of everyone's existence. No thanks. I'm glad one company at least isn't willing to do that. I've had it up to here with "Windows XP is good enough for me, make your software run on it" types.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
On the one hand I agree with you: on the other I quite like the fact that relatively large bodies of code I wrote 12 years ago still run unmodified (albeit in Windows desktop apps that have received updates and enhancements since then).
Due to these updates I don't know that they would still run on Windows XP but it's nice that the code hasn't needed to change.
Much of the code needs nothing more than a recompile. It’s just no one is doing that.
To run 32 bit stuff you need copies of all the system libraries. You lose a lot of RAM to that. You have to continue to ensure they don’t have bugs. All for apps that are abandoned.
I totally understand what apple is doing. I bet you a ton of those apps were never updated for iPhone 6 screen shizes either.
You would only lose the RAM and the disk space if the 32bit support is actually needed and installed. What’s better - having unused RAM and your app refusing to launch, or using RAM to run your important legacy app?