Re:SpaceX’s Dragon capsule successfully returns from ISS res...
by neolefty on Monday September 18, 2017 @09:51PM
(#15281215)
Nitpick: Can you actually hollow out an asteroid? It seems easier to use it to build an independently hollow structure.
Asteroids probably resemble piles of gravel -- maybe with ice mixed in -- more than chunks of stone or metal.
Update: Yes, this bugs me about The Expanse books. Spinning up Ceres to provide internal gravity ...
Re:SpaceX’s Dragon capsule successfully returns from ISS res...
by TeMPOraL on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @04:37AM
(#15282770)
> Spinning up Ceres to provide internal gravity ...
Spinning a rock can be done over long periods of time. In The Expanse, it was a decades-long project, that earned the Tycho Corporation some serious engineering cred.
Re:SpaceX’s Dragon capsule successfully returns from ISS res...
by lhopki01 on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @05:34AM
(#15283033)
Spinning up asteroids can't be done. The speed you'd need for significant gravity would rip the asteroid apart.
Re:SpaceX’s Dragon capsule successfully returns from ISS res...
by TeMPOraL on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @06:19AM
(#15283236)
[citation needed]
To put it into perspective, a 100,000 ton carrier houses around 5,000 people in tight quarters (the flight deck is just under 5 acres). and needs constant tending and provisioning for supplies. As an analogy to a space habitat they also make a kind of sense since they also have to house flying craft. There are only about a dozen carriers in the world at this size...or about a million tons.
Hollowed out asteroids with internal habitation spaces on the order of hundreds of internal cubic km would probably provide enough diversity to keep generations reasonably happy. The hollowing out process could supply raw material to space-based factories that would then build more habitat things and inter-habitat ships. Capture a couple comets and you have water, oxygen and other things. A small asteroid, something like 243 Ida has a total volume of over 25,000 km^3. Even if a couple km of shell were left, we're talking millions of tons of raw material.