Let's say Waymo spends $2 billion to get the training data necessary to produce a fully automated car. A few years later Uber has also spent $2 billion and has a the necessary training data. By that time Waymo has 10 times as much telemetry data, so its cars might be somewhat safer. But as long as Uber cars are safe enough to get regulatory approval they can compete effectively with Waymo. Beyond a certain point people generally care more about cost than safety - look at the airline industry.
Also consider that Tesla seems to be getting telemetry data for much less than Waymo or Uber - they have thousands of drivers who are willing to pay for sensors and test automated driving software for free.
As they should be... What good is a car if it can't be used for the occasional long trip? I expect my car to be up to the task to go visit friends or family 200km away on a whim, after coming home from work, instead of sitting idly while my battery is charging for a couple hours... I'm sure many users have the same expectations. Are we irrational?
Having family 100 miles away that you visit regularly is reason to get a 100+ mile range electric car. Having family that lives 100 miles away that you visit every 10 years is not.
NYC is a great example where many people making 100+k per year don't own a car because transportation != car.