News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Parents Who Pay to Be Watched. Parent comment

Re:Parents Who Pay to Be Watched by Chris2048 on Friday September 15, 2017 @01:16PM (#15258871)
I don't have any kids, but I still got rid of the TV. Passive, environmental entertainment is problematic. If you had a bowl of chocolate on your desk, it's easier to snack on them during the day - the same with media distractions.

Now, anything I watch is something I specifically seek out - pull, not push.

I do the same with video games, and I choose games that are more exiting, as opposed to long slogs - fixed-level/single-player FPS, or fixed length multiplayer sessions, as opposed to "stat-building" games, or candy-crunch "physiological manipulators".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Parents Who Pay to Be Watched by thanatropism on Friday September 15, 2017 @02:55PM (#15259728)
But it's better to stretch your caloric intake over the day than have huge meals.

I'm trying to do a schedule of snack bars over the afternoon and a small lunch now, over wanting to eat enough at noon to last until 9-10 PM.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Parents Who Pay to Be Watched by balfirevic on Friday September 15, 2017 @05:10PM (#15260805)
It's not better (nor worse). For some people it makes it easer to eat less overall, for others it's the opposite.
[ Parent | on HN ]