Re:Equifax’s Maddening Unaccountability
by thomas_howland on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @01:32AM
(#15225028)
There is a huge difference between taking a loan "on someone's behalf" (as their representative, eg by someone with power-of-attorney) versus via impersonating them. The former is rare but legitimate; the latter is fraud.
It may be fraud, but if it's possible, that's still a problem.
SSN can not be used as authorization, because it isn't secret information. And really, the same is true for credit card numbers; they're shared with too many parties to consider them secret.
Re:Equifax’s Maddening Unaccountability
by avodonosov on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @01:59AM
(#15225113)
I mean the latter. Changed "a loan on you behalf" to "a loan accouted to you"
Re:Equifax’s Maddening Unaccountability
by raverbashing on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @05:19AM
(#15225895)
Yes and outside of the US nobody would be able to do a loan with a power-of-attorney without showing evidence of it
It is so strange.
What gives banks right to do that?