News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A modest proposal by LoSboccacc on Saturday September 09, 2017 @06:30AM (#15206420)
gotta love the hn community, downvoting things that are correct but hurt them feels
Re:A modest proposal by Illniyar on Saturday September 09, 2017 @06:34AM (#15206436)
no, we downvote things that state an opinion as fact without even an attempt at explaining why, especially when done in a tone that is aggressive and disrespectful.
Re:A modest proposal by LoSboccacc on Saturday September 09, 2017 @06:36AM (#15206446)
It's not an opinion however. JSON is a standard. Kinda worries me professionals use it without having a clue.
Re:A modest proposal by Illniyar on Saturday September 09, 2017 @06:58AM (#15206503)
That JSON has a "good reason" for disallowing comments is an opinion, it could be a popular, well-known and established opinion or it could be completely uninformed. To know the difference one must explain it.

Also standards change, and professionals use their tools in ways the original creators did not imagine a lot, that doesn't make them clueless. Heck, even JSON is a result of professionals misusing a programming language syntax for a serialization protocol.

Re:A modest proposal by wpietri on Saturday September 09, 2017 @08:19AM (#15206748)
Your opinion that all opinions must be explained up front was not explained up front.
Re:A modest proposal by mrunkel on Saturday September 09, 2017 @06:53AM (#15206488)
The reason why something did or didn't make it into a standard are definitely opinions. All sneak had to do was to provide a link to the "damned good reason."