News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Equifax Faces Multibillion-Dollar Lawsuit Over Hack by gknoy on Friday September 08, 2017 @01:15PM (#15202074)
The damage is not the cost of getting a new SSN, but the cost of verifying that your info is safe (still safe?). This is why companies routinely list the _cost_ of dealing with hacking incidents (scrub all the servers, pay people overtime, etc). I think it's fair to assign costs similarly for equifax.
Re:Equifax Faces Multibillion-Dollar Lawsuit Over Hack by balls187 on Friday September 08, 2017 @02:25PM (#15202757)
Info monitoring is what, like $29.99 a month?

Perhaps reasonably ask for 3 years of monitoring, so $980

But those aren't actual costs incurred yet.

Re:Equifax Faces Multibillion-Dollar Lawsuit Over Hack by herewulf on Friday September 08, 2017 @06:15PM (#15204335)
My SSN won't change for my lifetime, so really they need to pay that cost of monitoring. Equifax, you owe me $23,392.20. It's in your interest to pay upfront to avoid the cost of inflation.
Re:Equifax Faces Multibillion-Dollar Lawsuit Over Hack by dragonwriter on Friday September 08, 2017 @06:21PM (#15204366)
> My SSN won't change for my lifetime

This breach, I suspect, makes that less likely to be true. After all, one of the few reasons a new SSN can be issued to someone who has one is “A victim of identity theft continues to be disadvantaged by using the original number”.

https://faq.ssa.gov/link/portal/34011/34019/Article/3789/Can...

Re:Equifax Faces Multibillion-Dollar Lawsuit Over Hack by tedmiston on Saturday September 09, 2017 @01:22PM (#15208024)
It would be interesting to see how they define "continues to" and "disadvantaged by" here. It sounds like it may be implying that multiple occurrences of issues need to happen and just knowing that your data's been breached, but not yet abused, could be insufficient qualifications for "disadvantaged by".
Re:Equifax Faces Multibillion-Dollar Lawsuit Over Hack by Chaebixi on Friday September 08, 2017 @04:14PM (#15203558)
That's retail and the pricing seems highly inflated. Does anyone actually buy these services at that price point?

Credit real time monitoring should be an entitlement for those whose data is being collected.