News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zed Shaw on C++ by aboodman on Thursday July 15, 2010 @11:35PM (#1520152)
For some concrete examples of the above: WebKit, Chromium, Gecko, and V8 are all C++.

My impression is that there is a very high startup cost with C++ to getting it working on the platforms you want to support and picking the subset that isn't going to screw you. Once you get over the hurdle, the improved memory management (I agree with the post Zed is ranting in response to) starts to pay dividends.

Re:Zed Shaw on C++ by pvdm on Friday July 16, 2010 @12:26AM (#1520279)
V8 is hardly a ringing endorsement for C++. Just sayin.
Re:Zed Shaw on C++ by mace on Friday July 16, 2010 @01:01AM (#1520341)
V8 is ringing endorsement for V8. It is just a well-designed JavaScript virtual machine. It's performant because it compiles JavaScript to native code and uses generational garbase collection.
Re:Zed Shaw on C++ by aboodman on Friday July 16, 2010 @12:57AM (#1520336)
Somebody below said just the opposite. Personally, I find V8 really nice to read and work with.

Which part of it do you not like?

Re:Zed Shaw on C++ by pvdm on Friday July 16, 2010 @03:36PM (#1522258)
Just so we are on the same page. I am refering to the V8 codec not the Javascript engine.
Re:Zed Shaw on C++ by zokier on Friday July 16, 2010 @04:30PM (#1522435)
The WebM one? It is called VP8, not V8.