News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook says it sold political ads to Russian company du... by AaronFriel on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @05:40PM (#15187343)
There are laws against foreign nationals to provide a "thing of value" to a US political campaign. This is obviously a difficult thing to tease out. My source on this is Eugene Volokh, a law professor and First Amendment attorney: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/201...

The fundamental question then is: was this intentional on behalf of the foreign agent to provide a "thing of value" to a US political campaign, and/or did a political candidate or campaign solicit this?

Re:Facebook says it sold political ads to Russian company du... by Ajedi32 on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @09:09PM (#15188427)
But in this hypothetical scenario they're not donating to a political campaign, they're buying advertising space directly from a private organization.

I suppose you could argue that ads which advocate for a political candidate could count as a "thing of value" for that candidate, but even in that case, there _is_ no foreign national to punish here; the entity that funded the effort is a foreign government, not an individual person.

Re:Facebook says it sold political ads to Russian company du... by AaronFriel on Sunday September 10, 2017 @06:53PM (#15214733)
One doesn't have to donate to a political campaign to contribute a "thing of value" to a campaign, that argument is elaborated on in the link I shared. The law does not define thing of value to be a donation or monetary contribution to a campaign, but something much broader, see 52 U.S.C. § 30121.

Likewise, foreign national is a legal term that includes foreign principals, which includes governments, see 22 U.S.C. § 611.