News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China's Central Bank Bans ICOs by gritzko on Monday September 04, 2017 @01:30PM (#15169613)
Filecoin? Consider Bit Torrent seeding/bandwidth. It is too cheap to count for at least 10 years. Even tit-for-tat is no longer necessary since LEDBAT was rolled out (circa 2010).

The stuff they are going to count "on the blockchain" is too cheap to count! Well, and blockchain transactions are kind of expensive and slow. See the problem?

Re:China's Central Bank Bans ICOs by vasilipupkin on Monday September 04, 2017 @01:32PM (#15169628)
the question was to name legitimate businesses doing ICOs. filecoin is certainly legitimate. You are talking about how their tech might fail and how their business might not work. that's great, and you could very well be correct, but that's not what we are discussing here
Re:China's Central Bank Bans ICOs by gritzko on Monday September 04, 2017 @01:46PM (#15169726)
I am rather certain that guys consumed less-legal substances while drafting their whitepapers. That is my top reason not to consider their business "legitimate".
Re:China's Central Bank Bans ICOs by vasilipupkin on Monday September 04, 2017 @02:00PM (#15169799)
Re:China's Central Bank Bans ICOs by gritzko on Monday September 04, 2017 @02:08PM (#15169841)
You didn't make a point, sorry.
Re:China's Central Bank Bans ICOs by vasilipupkin on Monday September 04, 2017 @02:27PM (#15169966)
ok, to those who didn't get my point. Everyone is certainly entitled to make up their own definition of "legitimate". However, as long as we are all speaking English, we can agree on what legitimate means. And it means the following:

le·git·i·mate adjective adjective: legitimate ləˈjidəmət/ 1. conforming to the law or to rules. "his claims to legitimate authority"

so, it's great to have a learned opinion on filecoin's tech, but its irrelevant to the discussion of whether filecoin is a legitimate business