News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bad UX: How Booking.com deceives clients by raverbashing on Saturday September 02, 2017 @05:50AM (#15155140)
As opposed to Trivago which is the worse kind of real life spam in existence?

Thanks, I'll keep using Booking

(Though the flashing things are annoying - but you can discover using booking then go to the hotel page and book there)

Re:Bad UX: How Booking.com deceives clients by dazc on Saturday September 02, 2017 @06:58AM (#15155346)
> but you can discover using booking then go to the hotel page and book there

Just a shame they often charge the same price so I think why did I bother doing them the favour?

Re:Bad UX: How Booking.com deceives clients by iaskwhy on Saturday September 02, 2017 @11:38AM (#15156512)
Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't, at least in Europe. If you're price sensitive, always check both before booking it.

Some examples: I've booked directly with the place to pay half price for one night in an amazing farm in Iceland; I've got the opposite last time I booked a night in a cheap hotel in Portugal. I usually check the Booking.com price and then check directly with the hotel then "Oh, but I've seen this cheaper in Booking.com", "Yes, please do the reservation via Booking.com then".

Re:Bad UX: How Booking.com deceives clients by FICO on Saturday September 02, 2017 @11:29AM (#15156443)
For most hotel chains if you join the loyalty programs then when you log in and book directly you get the member price which is usually $10-20/night lower.
Re:Bad UX: How Booking.com deceives clients by azza2110 on Saturday September 02, 2017 @08:27AM (#15155616)
The hotels are not allowed to offer a lower price than booking.com. To undercut, or offer bonuses, risks then getting pulled from one of their largest sales channels.
Re:Bad UX: How Booking.com deceives clients by NicoJuicy on Saturday September 02, 2017 @10:49AM (#15156226)
It went to court in the EU, this is not the case anymore