Re:Terry Pratchett's unfinished novels destroyed by steamroller
by jamiethompson on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @05:03AM
(#15130688)
That's a very old looking HDD. It seems odd that his most recent work would be on that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Terry Pratchett's unfinished novels destroyed by steamroller
by dspillett on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @05:56AM
(#15130884)
Could easily have been a drive that had been in his main work machine for quite some time. He no doubt had the good sense to have backups on other local drives and remote services[1], but this could still be his primary store. It isn't like holding the text of books in progress is a task that needs the speediest of SSDs so if that drive just kept working why would he replace it?
[1] presumably these have also been purged if his wishes were so written or interpreted, probably by more conventional means[2]
[2] the bulldozer being used for this one drive for ceremonial purposes
Re:Terry Pratchett's unfinished novels destroyed by steamroller
by johansch on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @07:02AM
(#15131123)
SATA drives replaced IDE drives (which this appears to be) more than ten years ago, somewhere around 2004-2006.
Re:Terry Pratchett's unfinished novels destroyed by steamroller
by dspillett on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @10:00AM
(#15132171)
PATA drives were still common enough ten years ago, maybe not in brand new machines but certainly in active ones and readily available as replacements/upgrades. Using a machine from ~10 years ago for document authoring isn't unusual. A good keyboard screen is more important than the rest of the machine for that sort of job - you don't need something new, fancy, & powerful, and many authors prefer an older machine because they can't run distractions well!
Re:Terry Pratchett's unfinished novels destroyed by steamroller
by kingbirdy on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @08:36AM
(#15131567)
He could have been on an old computer - GRRM, for example, still writes on an MS-DOS machine
Re:Terry Pratchett's unfinished novels destroyed by steamroller
by rullelito on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @05:42AM
(#15130841)
Yes, strange indeed, I expected Terry to only roll with the latest in tech.
Re:Terry Pratchett's unfinished novels destroyed by steamroller
by laumars on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @05:57AM
(#15130887)
Sarcasm? There has been interviews with him where he discusses his "writing equipment" and like many authors he preferred a basic system that kept mostly out of his way. I mean it's just as easy to write a novel in Word for DOS* as it is in the latest software and hardware tech, so why would authors want to waste their time always running the latest tech when it's a distraction from their day job?
* I'm not advocating people write novels in DOS. Just making an exaggerated point that since the medium is text only you don't need to be upgrading frequently.
Re:Terry Pratchett's unfinished novels destroyed by steamroller
by jrimbault on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @06:00AM
(#15130894)
Isn't GRR Martin famously writing on a DOS computer ?
Re:Terry Pratchett's unfinished novels destroyed by steamroller
by digi_owl on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @06:21AM
(#15130973)
Using Wordstar no less, must drive his editor and publisher bonkers.
Not that i can't relate. If i could find a CLI browser that kept up with latest CSS and JS stuff, i would be doing everything in a framebuffer CLI.