News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ask HN: GitHub vs. GitLab paid plans (2017). Parent comment

Re:Ask HN: GitHub vs. GitLab paid plans (2017) by dudul on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @09:45AM (#15124194)
The CE version is open source. I would argue that the gut feeling would be that it gets fixed faster than the enterprise version. Maybe not deployed as fast though.

Anyway, I would just go with GitLab regardless. It is more of a turn key solution than GitHub. You can set up automatic builds, use project management tools, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: GitHub vs. GitLab paid plans (2017) by petecooper on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @08:48AM (#15131625)
>The CE version is open source. I would argue that the gut feeling would be that it gets fixed faster than the enterprise version. Maybe not deployed as fast though.

I should clarify: I was referring to infrastructure issues rather than code quality. If servers go offline, I'm assuming the paying clients have a higher-grade SLA to no-cost clients, even if it's a few hours different.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: GitHub vs. GitLab paid plans (2017) by apetresc on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @12:06PM (#15125231)
Looking at the commits for GitLab CE, I can't really find a single recent contribution by someone not employed by GitLab. So I doubt it "gets fixed faster" than the enterprise version.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: GitHub vs. GitLab paid plans (2017) by blackst0ne on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @02:20AM (#15130052)
Actually there are many community contributions. E.g. for 9.5 it's 82 merged MRs from the community.

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests?scope...

[ Parent | on HN ]