Just tried with the golem.de article:

Google Translate:

> Better than Google and Microsoft - the German company DeepL is committed to translation services. DeepL uses a novel architecture of neural networks and uses a supercomputer with 5.1 petaflops. By the same company, the service comes Linguee who has already made with translations of individual words or phrases a name. Texts translated by humans are used for translations in order to provide better results.

DeepL:

> Better than Google and Microsoft - this is the goal that DeepL, a German company, has set itself, at least for translation services. DeepL uses a novel architecture of neural networks and relies on a supercomputer with 5.1 petaflops. The Linguee service, which has already made a name for itself with translations of individual words or groups of words, comes from the same company. In doing so, human-translated texts are used for translations in order to deliver better results.

I think the DeepL version makes more sense here, but I am not a German reader so I might be off.

Deepl is much better than Google translate. I could almost imagine reading its translation, and not noticing anything.

The DeepL version indeed makes more sense, but still has several things a human translator would probably do differently. Still very impressive.

(Unfortunately EN->DE translations from DeepL are not on the same level - yet -, at least not on the stuff I just put in.)

That's also first thing I tired, ... Looks like people are more predicable than we think. If I was them i would make sure that I do a good job on that.

Tried it myself. Can confirm that it's extremely impressive!