News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi... by adrianN on Monday August 28, 2017 @11:09AM (#15116996)
There are no good technical reasons why trains are not automated more often. The technology is there, many trains do in fact run autonomously. It's just unpopular for long distance trains because current systems don't do obstacle detection and its hard to secure long distance tracks against obstacles. But for high speed trains at least there is no point in trying to visually recognize obstacles: if you see an obstacle it's already too late to brake meaningfully.
Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi... by SEJeff on Monday August 28, 2017 @11:22AM (#15117131)
Level 4 automation trains do in fact do obstacle detection and are capable of unattended operation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_automated_urban_metro_...

Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi... by noobermin on Monday August 28, 2017 @11:18AM (#15117087)
>It's just unpopular for long distance trains because current systems don't do obstacle detection and its hard to secure long distance tracks against obstacles.

That doesn't sound like it's just because "unpopular", in fact, that sounds like a technical reason. It sounds like you're really saying "they are limited, but people are bad too, so it shouldn't matter."