Re:AdNauseam – Clicking Ads So You Don't Have To
by jbreckmckye on Sunday August 27, 2017 @06:06AM
(#15110053)
It is not the server costs that are expensive; it's producing the content.
Re:AdNauseam – Clicking Ads So You Don't Have To
by pdkl95 on Sunday August 27, 2017 @06:54AM
(#15110191)
Your claim was about the cost to "publish on the net", not the cost of production.
Re:AdNauseam – Clicking Ads So You Don't Have To
by convery on Sunday August 27, 2017 @06:17AM
(#15110076)
This. I feel like a lot of the responses are along the lines of; "you can get a VPS for 2€ so your site will still be profitable if 99% of users adblock; stop whining".
Re:AdNauseam – Clicking Ads So You Don't Have To
by Tech-Noir on Sunday August 27, 2017 @06:40AM
(#15110137)
I think what people are saying is nobody owes you a living (this isn't meant to sound rude, I mean you don't owe anyone else one either, do you).
If something isn't working the way you want, that's a sign to do something else.
Here's a beautiful and informative website: https://bestmotherfucking.website/
According to Firefox's Network Monitor, that's 2.47kB of data transfer. It's static HTML, so server load is minimal. One small donation could cover the costs for years.