News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fun vs. Computer Science (2016) by yorwba on Saturday August 26, 2017 @01:12PM (#15106316)
Thank you for the recommendation. I think I found the paper that introduced the idea: http://www.it.uu.se/research/group/hipe/papers/succ_types.pd...

If I understand correctly, success typing rejects only programs that will lead to a type error at runtime, but allows all programs that it can't prove incorrect. I think that's an interesting idea and definitely better than no type checks at all, but I'd still like to have a type system that can prove some programs to be type safe, if possible.

Re:Fun vs. Computer Science (2016) by branja on Saturday August 26, 2017 @02:58PM (#15106827)
I agree. Yet I want as much inference as possible as you described upthread