Ok, so it's license philosophy rather than any actual license legality problematics, I can understand that.
Re:New implementation of Git in OCaml
by michaelmrose on Saturday August 26, 2017 @01:18PM
(#15106345)
If someone wanted to produce a FreeBSD derivative would they really need to be able to ship a modified version of git?
Suffice to say, FreeBSD's current stance on licensing is that new GPL2 software in base is unacceptable, and the goal is to get to no GPL2 software in base.
Re:New implementation of Git in OCaml
by xyzzy_plugh on Saturday August 26, 2017 @04:53PM
(#15107385)
Probably not, but then it wouldn't be "Free".
Also https://www.openbsd.org/goals.html and https://www.netbsd.org/about/redistribution.html#why-berkele...