News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:D as a Better C by OoooooooO on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @06:27PM (#15085741)
Inferred lifetimes? A man can hope :).
Re:D as a Better C by dbaupp on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @08:17PM (#15086499)
Inferring lifetimes from the implementation of a function won't happen for the same reason that inferring types won't happen: it is really nice for the signature of a function to not automatically be changed if the body is changed, instead programmers should be told when they might be breaking their users.

However, the compiler could (and did, I believe) run inference and suggest a fix that the programmer can explicitly include.

Re:D as a Better C by steveklabnik on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @06:51PM (#15085886)
If it were always possible to infer all lifetimes, we'd do it. Unfortunately that's not the case.

There are a number of RFCs in the pipeline to help with lifetimes, including more elision. In no particular order:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2115

https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2094

https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2093