News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How San Francisco's bike-share scheme became a symbol of ... by falcolas on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @12:01PM (#15082581)
What something is, and what something is seen as, are rarely the same thing. Even something shared across class boundaries.

Visiting a coffee shop (no matter what you buy) will always be seen as a luxury activity, even though people have been going to diners for coffee (or making their own) for years.

Re:How San Francisco's bike-share scheme became a symbol of ... by rhallie11 on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @12:05PM (#15082629)
Probably because coffee shops tend to charge two to four times more for a cup than a diner would. Like, you could buy a bag of coffee grounds for the amount some people pay
Re:How San Francisco's bike-share scheme became a symbol of ... by falcolas on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @12:19PM (#15082764)
If you just get a cup of coffee, the price is usually about the same, modulo free refills. The quality from the coffee shop is also usually better.

Diners (at least those where I live) have started offering more options (including cappuccino style concoctions) in response to the coffee house trend, and now tend to match the prices of those coffee houses.

Re:How San Francisco's bike-share scheme became a symbol of ... by rhallie11 on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @12:33PM (#15082893)
Yeah, at this point, it might just be lingering feelings of luxury, even if its no longer the reality for the most part.
Re:How San Francisco's bike-share scheme became a symbol of ... by santaclaus on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @01:01PM (#15083153)
Yea but by the time you make friends with the baristas you are only paying for like half your coffees though.
Re:How San Francisco's bike-share scheme became a symbol of ... by lotsofpulp on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @12:54PM (#15083083)
Diners are also terrible in the quality of food, service, and amenities they provide.
Re:How San Francisco's bike-share scheme became a symbol of ... by mcbruiser3 on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @12:30PM (#15082858)
what something is seen as is largely shaped by politicians jockeying for power and muckraking journalists whoring their principals for clicks.

edit: again with the downvotes? is this not largely true? I think you give most people too much credit if you disagree with this. please back up your down votes with some kind of argument.

Re:How San Francisco's bike-share scheme became a symbol of ... by oculusthrift on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @12:33PM (#15082895)
meh you're blaming two small groups. the general public as a whole deserves a lot of blame as well
[dead]
Re:How San Francisco's bike-share scheme became a symbol of ... by dang on Thursday August 24, 2017 @02:26AM (#15088039)
Would you please stop posting unsubstantive comments to HN and (more importantly) stop using the site for ideological battle? That's destructive of what HN is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html