Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma...
by mhb on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @01:54PM
(#15074827)
1. Government 'dissident' listens to 'subversive' podcasts via Sonos.
2. Government compels Sonos to provide data on customers' listening histories.
3. Chilling effect, political implications, oppression.
Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma...
by bigiain on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @11:30PM
(#15078306)
If you're a "government dissident" and you're inviting internet connected always-on microphones into your home - you're doing it wrong...
"Alexa? Send details of my subversive plan to the government!"
"OK Google, upload the audio of the last 30mins discussion with my co-conspirators directly to PRISM!"
"Hey Siri? Which law enforcement agency needs to know about this surprise protest we just planned?"
Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma...
by mhb on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @08:16AM
(#15080823)
What does this have to do with Sonos?
Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma...
by crispyambulance on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @04:01PM
(#15075869)
If an out-of-control oppressive government is the real concern here, is a flimsy EULA _really_ going to provide any protection whatsoever? Can you really even have 100% trust that the EULA will be obeyed by the company if they can get away with violating it?
I am trying to think of concrete examples of scenarios where actual harm would REALISTICALLY be done to individual consumers because of Sonos privacy policy.