News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma... by FilterSweep on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @10:54AM (#15072974)
Streaming Content Provider vs. Physical Device specifically made to play music you physically own or streamed from devices you physically own.
Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma... by crispyambulance on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @12:45PM (#15074122)
You can play stuff you physically own from a Roku too. Are you saying that Sonos could arbitrarily upload your media files to their servers? Doubtful. At worst, they could do a sound-print analysis locally on the device to identify it and send the metadata to Sonos.

I am trying to think of concrete examples of scenarios where actual harm would REALISTICALLY be done to individual consumers because of Sonos privacy policy.

Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma... by mhb on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @01:54PM (#15074827)
1. Government 'dissident' listens to 'subversive' podcasts via Sonos.

2. Government compels Sonos to provide data on customers' listening histories.

3. Chilling effect, political implications, oppression.

Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma... by bigiain on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @11:30PM (#15078306)
If you're a "government dissident" and you're inviting internet connected always-on microphones into your home - you're doing it wrong...

"Alexa? Send details of my subversive plan to the government!"

"OK Google, upload the audio of the last 30mins discussion with my co-conspirators directly to PRISM!"

"Hey Siri? Which law enforcement agency needs to know about this surprise protest we just planned?"

Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma... by mhb on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @08:16AM (#15080823)
What does this have to do with Sonos?
Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma... by crispyambulance on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @04:01PM (#15075869)
If an out-of-control oppressive government is the real concern here, is a flimsy EULA _really_ going to provide any protection whatsoever? Can you really even have 100% trust that the EULA will be obeyed by the company if they can get away with violating it?
Re:Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices ma... by s73ver_ on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @06:11PM (#15076810)
I'm not pleased at this Sonos development either, but that's way too tinfoil hat for me.