News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:R7RS Considered Unifier of Previous Standards (2015) [pdf] by fusiongyro on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @11:58AM (#15073648)
Racket is a Scheme descendent, but it isn't exactly Scheme.

https://racket-lang.org/new-name.html

A lot of modern languages seem to eschew what they are derived from; Pharo isn't Smalltalk either, SWI-Prolog now defaults to a standards-incompatible mode, etc.

Re:R7RS Considered Unifier of Previous Standards (2015) [pdf] by pjmlp on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @01:04PM (#15074308)
I would say it is a consequence of their origins fading away on the mainstream or being stuck in some university classes.

So they have to search for new grounds, instead of being stuck into a design that no longer has the attention of the industry.

Re:R7RS Considered Unifier of Previous Standards (2015) [pdf] by fusiongyro on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @01:53PM (#15074820)
Having a language defined by a standard is good if you can't have portable compilers/interpreters. Once your compiler is available on all the platforms you use, the utility seems to fall off a cliff.
Re:R7RS Considered Unifier of Previous Standards (2015) [pdf] by pjmlp on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @02:10AM (#15078937)
I agree regarding standards, my point is that the existing standards got stuck into a point that does appeal to the masses any longer.

Another example is Pascal, the original standard was too little for what people were actually using it for.

Most of the extensions were then standardized as Extended Pascal, but no one cared because a selling point was being Turbo Pascal compatible.