I don't read Breitbart (nor most media tbh), but I just skimmed through this site and can't find anything related to national socialism. It just looks like another right-wing news site, being that national socialism is a center-wing political stance, I think it is incompatible in principle.

Do you have any link of them claiming to be nazis or taking nazis stances about something? Or do you just call nazi anyone who disagrees with you? Not trying to pick a fight, just honestly asking.

The nazi thing is just the next smear campaign after muh russia narrative.

Nazis are centrists now? What the fuck.

Maybe you're a bit confused about political ideologies. Check https://www.politicalcompass.org/test

If you want to use your own version of "left" and "right" then you can put Nazis anywhere you like.

Aren't you using your own version? The original meaning of left and right is the French Revolution, where people who sat on the left wanted revolution and people who sat on the right wanted to keep the status quo. People who sat in the center wanted a little bit of both. Then the definition transitioned to left being collectivism and right being capitalism.

But for some reason a good portion of academia (to not say most) labeled right as authoritarian and violent, and left as humanitarian and progressive. Hell, even Wikipedia and Google definitions says that national socialism is a far right-wing movement. So I don't blame you, definitions are a bit messy

I'm using the common version. It's not that the right is authoritarian and violent and the left is humanitarian and progressive. It's that extremes on both sides are authoritarian and violent, but differently. (Nazis vs Communists being the obvious example there.)

I actually think the 2D version discussed in your link makes a lot of sense overall. But I think it's a mistake to label the horizontal axis as "Left/Right." Just label it "Collectivist/Individualist" like the vertical is labeled "Authoritarian/Libertarian."

This is an artifact of the real echo-chamber people should be concerned about.

A right-wing website being "incompatible in principle" with national socialism which is "center-wing"??

Do you realize what you are saying here?

Well, I can list a few incompatibilities if you want:

* Right-wing is usually in favor of free market and free enterprise, whilst NSAP stole private property (mostly from Jews) and heavily controlled the economy, also got out of the international financial system.

* Right-wing is usually against gun controls, whilst NSAP was very gun control.

* Right-wing is usually pro free speech for everyone no matter what. NSAP was not pro free speech. Government literally ran the media.

* Right-wing is mostly against welfare state, while NSAP was very pro welfare state. In fact Otto von Bismarck (a personal hero for Hitler) was the creator of the welfare state as we know it.

They do, however share some nationalism views and don't like open borders, and think that protectionism is ok. So there's that.

> Right-wing is usually in favor of free market and free enterprise

Nope; while that's a libertarian point of view also shared (though typically balanced against other concerns, for those not primarily libertarians) by a number of center- and moderate-right (and center- and moderate-left) groups.

> Right-wing is usually against gun controls, whilst NSAP was very gun control.

That's a fairly recent quirk of the American Republican party, not true of the general right-wing.

> Right-wing is usually pro free speech for everyone no matter what. NSAP was not pro free speech. Government literally ran the media.

Free speech, is again, a libertarian position with fairly broad support from the moderate left to moderate right, though those that aren't primarily libertarians on both sides tend to be likely to favor significant restrictions because of competing priorities. Pure free speech has never been a position typifying the right wing.

> > Right-wing is mostly against welfare state, while NSAP was very pro welfare state

No, the NSDAP was not pro-welfare state. (The welfare state is not just any state that does more than libertarian minarchists would prefer.)

The American right loves gun control as long as it's directed against what they see as the proper target. Candidate Trump said he wanted police to stop people on the street and confiscate their guns. The only reason there wasn't a complete revolt in his party over this was the understanding that he meant it would only be done to minorities.

I doubt this is a choice on Shopify's part; it's almost certainly coming upstream from their payments partners.

https://stripe.com/blog/why-some-businesses-arent-allowed

I understand how it's likely to cause trouble for the merchant if they allow pornographic items. But don't pretend you'll "defend to the death my right to say it". Here's a cause! Why not defend to the death?

There are clearly some processors which accept adult products, as demonstrated by the fact that you can buy dildos online with a credit card. Why doesn't Shopify use partners that are more free?

It looks like Shopify allows adult products in general, but it's not worth anything if you're able to get money for it.

To some people, "defending free speech" only means protecting swastikas, but not female nipples. Why aren't business willing to defend my right to sell a double penetration!

Marijuana still can't be legally sold in the US under federal law afaik. So that behavior is consistent with Lutke's stated philosophy.

I'm not sure why they block the adult industry. Perhaps extremely high rates of credit card fraud?

Damn it, there goes my idea for Tobias Lutke dildos.