Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today
by lnx01 on Friday August 18, 2017 @08:17PM
(#15050767)
An electron app, without electron, accessed via chrome in chrome? ... So, a ... Webapp? You mean like, gmail.com or outlook.com?
Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today
by m_mueller on Friday August 18, 2017 @08:21PM
(#15050784)
Apperently more like a plugin. Pure web technologies don't give you more than a couple 100mb of local storage (at best).
Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today
by reissbaker on Friday August 18, 2017 @10:12PM
(#15051251)
I don't know whether Superhuman will be a plugin or not, but there's no reason it would have to be; IndexedDB can provide gigabytes of space, and it's standardized, and current versions of Chrome, FF, and Safari all support it.
Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today
by m_mueller on Friday August 18, 2017 @11:52PM
(#15051564)
Depends if you consider IE and Mobile Safari as a required target. They have 250MB and 50MB limits, respectively. But yes, if these can be omitted then IndexedDB API seems fine nowadays.
Edit: MS Edge also has 250MB-500MB; they're just always playing catch up, even when their market share has dwindled...
Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today
by egeozcan on Saturday August 19, 2017 @07:07AM
(#15052749)
Does the spec define the minimum amount of space the browser must allocate?
Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today
by colordrops on Saturday August 19, 2017 @02:06AM
(#15051948)
Can normal webpages access IMAP and SMTP servers?
Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today
by darklajid on Saturday August 19, 2017 @10:39AM
(#15053616)
Like gmail.com or outlook.com, if they were limited enough to support just one browser..
No, that is not a website or webapp, it's a Chrome app.
Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today
by wodenokoto on Saturday August 19, 2017 @02:08AM
(#15051951)
No.
think electron app, but without electron, and instead running directly in chrome.