Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by danso on Friday August 18, 2017 @07:42PM (#15050609)

Maybe it's the Unix fan in me talking, but I don't get the point of "undo send". Why are you hitting "send" if you have doubts about sending, instead of putting it into the Drafts folder and taking a 10 minute break? If you're afraid of sending an email with a typo, why not get into the habit of proofreading to your satisfaction before sending the email?

"Undo send" seems to me to be inherently inferior to having some self-discipline and patience. Whatever last second doubts you've had are now simply pushed forward. Except now you've set a timer, which creates additional chance for failure -- either on the back end or on the user side, e.g. the timer expiring just as you try to panic cancel -- that there isn't when you just don't hit send in the first place.

I get that products have to be designed for human comfort over pure technical effectiveness, but this is design that appeases -- at a very surface level -- one of our least helpful indiscretions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by jacalata on Friday August 18, 2017 @08:03PM (#15050701)

> Undo send" seems to me to be inherently inferior to having some self-discipline and patience

I eagerly await your new email client which provides both self discipline and patience to users. Until it releases, I suspect the Undo Send option will continue to be used.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by danso on Friday August 18, 2017 @08:07PM (#15050721)

But email has been this way for a very long time. And aren't many other common user-to-user messaging systems this way? iOS messages and old-fashioned texting/SMS, for instance. And postal mail and phone calls and answering machines and face-to-face interactions, for that matter.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by jacalata on Friday August 18, 2017 @08:09PM (#15050734)

I think of it as more important when email is being used as an announcement medium - I'm ok leaving a mistake/sending a correction to one or two people, but not 1100.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by danso on Friday August 18, 2017 @08:28PM (#15050814)

Presumably you also put more time and focus into emails that are being sent to 1,100 recipients versus emails to 1 recipient, and you send more of the latter than you do the former. But the "undo send" gives you 10 minutes of extra-edit time to that important announcement as well as every other email you send.

If "undo send" gives a psych boost to being obsessive-compulsive, this still doesn't address the additional layer of possible failure. You have better control over your ability to not hit "Send" then you do to do a panic cancel as you do a last second proofread.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by mod on Friday August 18, 2017 @09:55PM (#15051180)

I accidentally ctrl+enter fairly often when formatting emails.

You're trying to cram everyone's problem into the same box, it's silly.

There's plenty of reasons you might undo an email if you had the chance.

Taking a 10-minute break is not something I've ever done before I sent an email.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by danso on Friday August 18, 2017 @10:57PM (#15051396)

I've done that too. For emails and for things that have an undo/delete option since their inception (Twitter, Facebook, Slack). With email I've accepted to be more careful about when sending very important emails. And for less important emails, be OK with sending an addendum, even when it's on a mailing list.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by uhnuhnuhn on Friday August 18, 2017 @08:03PM (#15050704)

I've unintentionally sent emails by absent-mindedly hitting the wrong sequence of keys on my keyboard.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by mrob on Saturday August 19, 2017 @12:22AM (#15051654)

Your method requires putting extra time and effort into every email you write. "Undo send" requires extra time and effort only when something goes wrong. Email isn't for instant communication, so adding a short delay to make it easier is a good tradeoff.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by KekDemaga on Friday August 18, 2017 @07:53PM (#15050646)

Its for when you accidentally click send, not for emails you regret.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by jacalata on Friday August 18, 2017 @08:02PM (#15050691)

It's definitely for both. Like that scenario where you copy edit something for hours and as soon as it's sent you see a typo for the first time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by gvx on Saturday August 19, 2017 @02:55PM (#15054976)

I'm sure there's a law that no matter how carefully you proofread something, you'll find at least one typo the first time you read it after it's been published.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by badloginagain on Friday August 18, 2017 @07:53PM (#15050647)

As a human, I like to have tools to fix/prevent human error.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Superhuman is what Gmail would be if built today by hota_mazi on Saturday August 19, 2017 @02:17AM (#15051966)

Yeah seriously.

I don't understand why people keep making mistakes.

[ Parent | on HN ]