Re:Opioid makers made payments to one in 12 U.S. doctors
by frankydp on Friday August 18, 2017 @07:46PM
(#15050621)
Aren't there multiple groups that provide the guidelines for treatment? Specifically all of the specialty associations. (Gastro, Oncology...)
Going outside recommended guidelines can be very very expensive for a physician.
The understanding of opioid use has clinically changed drastically in the last 40 years, similar to SSRIs in the last 70 years.
Not that I do not agree with your premise, but the issue seems to be much more institutional and related to human, research, and implementation error than a bunch of individual bad actors.
Re:Opioid makers made payments to one in 12 U.S. doctors
by davidmr on Saturday August 19, 2017 @12:09AM
(#15051618)
I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say. Is it your contention that, if anyone could get opiates without any regulation or prescription, fewer people would take them than they do now? Why would scrutiny of any kind by anyone lead to reduced usage in a case like this if that scrutiny had no regulatory effect on who could obtain narcotic painkillers?
I understand (though disagree with) the libertarian philosophy that you should be free to take anything you please, but I fail to see how such a situation would lead to decreased use.
I am not saying they are a corrupt class, nor would I mean to imply that. But I do think we need to think of physicians as a part of health care, rather than at the top of it.
The entire drug regulation system is predicated on the idea that you have certain providers, namely physicians, who are competent to make decisions, and shifting that decision-making power to those providers protects us from harm.
The opioid crisis has demonstrated that whole paradigm is faulty.
The problem is that no one profession should be entrusted with that level of power or command over decisions.
Imagine, instead, a system where there was no drug regulation. Rather than assuming that physicians were making the best decisions about opioid use and sweeping the problem under the rug, such use would be constantly scrutinized.
We need more competition, and fewer gatekeepers. Gatekeeping means there's only one thing that needs to be breached.