Re:HelenOS: portable microkernel-based multiserver operating...
by naasking on Friday August 18, 2017 @01:13PM
(#15047969)
It seems pretty trivial: every hypervisor and/or virtualized system is running a type of microkernel. If it's fast enough for the cloud, it's fast enough period.
Re:HelenOS: portable microkernel-based multiserver operating...
by sitkack on Friday August 18, 2017 @01:25PM
(#15048063)
I find it ironic that Linux itself is an application running underneath a microkernel.
Re:HelenOS: portable microkernel-based multiserver operating...
by kazinator on Friday August 18, 2017 @01:27PM
(#15048085)
Running Linux under something lower level is old hat, see RTLinux:
http://www.yodaiken.com/papers/BarabanovThesis.pdf [1997]
Well, that's not exactly a microkernel, but took lots of inspiration from microkernels.
I take it that you may be alluding to the debate between Torvalds and Tannenbaum regarding microkernels.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanenbaum%E2%80%93Torvalds_deb...
Re:HelenOS: portable microkernel-based multiserver operating...
by naasking on Friday August 18, 2017 @03:09PM
(#15048924)
The first PowerPC linux for the Power Mac ran under the Mach microkernel [1].
Then there was also L4Linux, which I believe was the first low-overhead virtualization of Linux using the L4 microkernel. Papers demonstrated < 10% overhead I believe, where previous virtualization efforts were somewhat higher. I'd say it kicked off the whole paravirtualization/virtualization craze.
Unfortunately, I am not aware of a compilation of misconceptions on microkernels article that's more valuable than this one.