Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF
by eli_gottlieb on Friday August 18, 2017 @10:00AM
(#15046231)
How many tiki-torch demonstrations is worth one Auschwitz, in terms of events actually happening? You know, let's just put things in QALYs or utils or something and use good old-fashioned consequentialism.
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF
by scrollaway on Friday August 18, 2017 @09:56AM
(#15046187)
How can you call racism a political belief?
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF
by abiox on Friday August 18, 2017 @10:13AM
(#15046335)
Sometimes it seems as if there are as many definitions of 'racism' as there are people discussing it.
'Race nationalism' is certainly political. I suspect most people would associate that with 'racism' in at least some way.
[dead]
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF
by dang on Friday August 18, 2017 @03:20PM
(#15048988)
Boilerplate ideological talking points are off topic on Hacker News. We ban accounts that people create for that purpose and have banned this one. Would you please not create such accounts here?
You've got this all backwards. We should be most concerned about censorship of political beliefs, however wrongheaded they are.