Antifa and the extreme left do apply that kind of rhetoric in their critique of "capitalism", but I find it quite extreme and not to be taken seriously.
Still, the black block trashed the city and attacked people with deadly force (it's a wonder no one was killed.)
Black bloc has its roots opposing police violence, and this is consistent through their history, so I should have said "fascist, racist and anti-oppression rally"
Both should be opposed in effective ways.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/opinion/how-to-make-fun-o...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/us/antifa-left-wing-facti...
I find it obscure how people go on justifying violence when it just happens to feel good with the political agenda.
I am distinguishing between the historically offensive violent ideologies of nazis and racists, with the historically reactionary use of violence-as-a-tactic for antifa and black bloc.
The latters use of violence should be stopped, since it isn't helping in furthering the lefts political agenda. We wouldn't be talking about them at all if not for the rise of Hitler in the 1930s and Trump now.
These groups are not all the same level of threats to society. We need to focus on stopping the violence on all sides through better protesting permits apparently, and stopping the fascists and racists from gaining more political power.
This is what this statement is about: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/nyregion/aclu-free-speech...